Social Media Halloween Fun

Twitter Halloween Icons

A sample of a few Twitter Halloween Icons. Full list can be seen on Greenspace

During the holidays, social media services join in the festivities with fun features that everyone can use.  Halloween is upon us and several services have participated in the fun.  Here’s a short list of services and what they are doing:

As I find more examples I’ll add them to my list. Hope you enjoy Halloween and have fun trick or treating!

Obama’s Interesting Use of YouTube

Barak Obama’s campaign shows it has been very thoughtful in using web 2.0 and social media to effectively spread a message.  The two important aspects of this are: 1) to think outside of the box and 2) to engage your audience. These are lessons corporations and advertisers can learn from.

The video above, titled “Take Election Day Off” make’s its point clear, take a day off.  It is not a collection of videos making several points. It is short, direct, makes very familiar references (such as the Wii-mote), provides comfortable chill music, and speaks to a broad audience: students and workers.  What is really interesting is it seems this video was created specifically for YouTube and Internet consumption.  Rather than recycling versions of advertisements (as seen by McCain’s use of YouTube), Obama uses YouTube to spread his message, ideas, and thoughts to those on YouTube and across the Internet.

While YouTube’s use and importance is well documented, the thought process in its use is the creative outside of the box thinking.  McCain has several hundred videos, compared to the 1700+ of Obama’s, the difference here shows that someone is engaged in a platform while another thinks of it as an afterthought.  It is further enhanced by the sorts of videos each candidate posts, McCain’s are advertisements that can also be viewed on television while Obama uses short made for YouTube video’s to talk to his supporters (such as this video below about not letting up.)

It is very interesting to see these two trains of thoughts attempting to reach the same goal.  Each follows a model that companies and advertisers have used for years, in my opinion, Obama’s is more effective. Using YouTube for your campaign or to distribute a message is not thinking out of the box anymore.  It’s what you do with it.  If you are engaging them with content made specifically for that platform, then your beginning to look beyond the boundaries of the box.

Firefox vs. Chrome

Google’s Chrome is an excellent web browser; it is fast with a clean and simple interface.  For the past month I’ve been using Chrome as my default web browser to compare its performance to Firefox (my regular browser).  Chrome has some bugs still left to shake out (it is a browser in development) but very polished which is more than I expected.  Chrome handles JavaScript faster than Firefox, although with bugs are seen heavily with some JavaScript intensive applications (such as Plurk).  Comparing system memory and resources, I have some mixed results, compared to the current release of Firefox (3.0) Chrome uses slightly less system resources, although the upcoming version of Firefox (3.1) appears to change that fact.  The real difference between the two browsers when comparing memory and system use is Chrome’s multi-processes architecture, a feature I expect (and hope) Firefox will adopt in the future.

While I enjoy using Chrome, I keep coming back to Firefox, although many of Chrome’s features are very innovate (some you can mimic through extensions). There are a few issues I have with Chrome such as: weak support for RSS integration (such as Firefox’s Live Bookmarks), non-keyword bookmarking and lack of a bookmark export, poor support with streaming Windows Media Files (a symptom Firefox suffers from occasionally, not nearly as bad as Chrome) and its lack of add-on and extensions (although they are planned).

Chrome pushes a lot of innovative advances to the web browser it lags slightly behind Firefox as the browser to use (no one should be using IE). However, Chrome is still in development and very young compared to Firefox.  If the current development is any indication of what is to come, Chrome may and should take over as a dominant browser (provided Firefox remains stagnant).